Soussan DAS Computer Consultants

Our Team
Cool Stuff
KeyholeKeyboardLaptop ComputerComputer Chip

How can I make my Wi-Fi better in my home or office?

It’s a question that I hear… A lot. Which tells me that a lot of people are having issues with their Wi-Fi coverage. The quick answer is there is no one solution that will work for everybody. If you’ve searched the web with this question anytime recently you’ve probably seen pop-up ads on various other websites about buy this one product and plug it in and all your Wi-Fi woes will disappear. I’d love to tell you that is an answer and it will work and be done with it. But unfortunately while it can be true it seldom is.

Those kinds of products have a 100% chance of wasting your money in some situations, a 100% chance of fixing your problem in other situations, and a 100% chance of kind of maybe making it a little bit sort of better for the third group of buyers.

Click Here for Press Release

If you came here hoping for the quick easy answer, stop reading now - this is not the article you are looking for.

I’ll follow the path I do in most of my articles, with a little bit of theory, a lot of education, and hopefully practical examples you can take and do something useful with. If your eyes are already rolling and you are already thinking "TL;DR" (that is internet geeky speak for "Too Long, Didn't Read") then seriously - stop reading now.

Otherwise ... go get your beverage of choice, relax, and prepare to have your mind expanded.


Put an intro here

Here is a typical wireless Modem from the cable company and a wireless router installed by a building owner in Seattle. All photos are thumbnails - click for a larger version. On top marked in red is the cable modem, on the bottom marked in blue is the router & wireless access point.

Cable Modem and Router

I’ll use this as my first example - but first some theory and knowledge are necessary before we look at solving this one. The building is two stories and a basement, 5 apartments, bulit in the 1920s with brick outside and plaster walls inside, and this router provides Wi-Fi for about 3500 ft.².

Wi-Fi Fundamentals

Wi-Fi signals travel over radio waves. There are two frequency bands or areas of radio spectrum that are currently allocated, 2.4 GHz and 5.8 GHz. 2.4 GHz ("B/G band") typically reaches about 100 feet in open air and 5.8 GHz ("A" band) typically reaches about 1/3 of that or 33 feet. 2.4 has greater range but less speed and less channels, 5.8 has more channels so less chance for interference and has greater speed but also doesn't go as far or go through obstacles as well. This is a gross oversimplification aimed at non-engineering folks, so if you’re an engineer keep in mind I’ve taken a lot of liberties aimed at non-engineers so don’t beat me up too badly.

You can think of the signals coming from the antennas of this access point is creating a balloon around those antennas. The antennas are in the center of the balloon and everywhere inside the balloon you have some signal. If you are outside the balloon, you have no signal.

It isn't quite that "Good/Bad" but "Great, Good, Not as great but still usable, connects but barely usable, not able to connect" as you get further away. At that furthest distance, your signal still reaches but you just can't connect both ways. Signal strength follows the "Inverse square law" so at half the distance the signal doubles; half again and it doubles again ... and the reverse is also true. So to get to "Good signal" I'll draw a circle 50 feet around the antennas.

Looking overhead down on the property let me plot this balloon in two dimensions:


The little red plus sign around the center of the building numbered 311 in the center of the picture represents the location of the wireless router in the building. I drew some concentric circles around the WAP to show some approximate sizes of the balloon of signal - if the building wasn't there... Plus the scales are off as the building is more like 55' deep and 40' across from the bulding is already inside the next building. But these are all approximations anyway to give you an idea.

This should illustrate the problem - do you see it?

Over half of this access points green & good signal is going into the street, into the cars, and the not as good portion is touching the building on the other side of the street.

Which leads me to the first, best and cheapest way to make things better:

Improvement #1: position the wireless access point to optimize its signal

So for this example, the first thing I would recommend is to move that wireless access point, the center of the balloon, to the very center of the building. If you do this, you’ll get better coverage in the back half of the building, better coverage in the middle of the building because you’re near the access point, and as an added benefit your signals won’t necessarily spill out into the street where other people can potentially try to access those signals. Right now the wireless signal hits the white truck parked outside the front door better than it hits anyone living inside the building.

This is usually the cheapest and easiest solution - you might have to run a cable to a central location or if you have a cable outlet nearby move the access point ... but move the center of the balloon so the air is in more of your house is my number one choice.

Keep in mind if you have an upstairs but no basement, the best position might be on the floor upstairs and not on your main floor on a table or in a cabinet. Again, visualize the center of the balloon - where is the air inside the balloon in your house?

My next option is really my third choice for effectiveness, but I'm listing it next as it can be the next in line as far as cost goes:

Improvement #3: Wireless repeater(s)

Another option is a commercially available wireless repeater. This radio device picks up frequencies that you set it to and re-broadcast it on another channel, extending your wireless perimeter. This is probably the most common over hyped advertisement that you’ll see on the Internet after you searched for improve my wireless performance. Inside there are usually instructions that few people will actually read about how to get the best performance out of your wireless repeater.

The key here is to position the wireless repeater so it gets a GREAT signal from your main station. That means it has to be in the brighter green zone, not the grey zone. If you put it in the grey zone, you might get a great signal around the repeater but it is repeating a so-so signal which means your internet will be only as good as the repeater's so-so signal is receiving.

Which is what the owner of this building did - they have another balloon extending the Wi-Fi signal to the back of the building but it is on an edge and upstairs so it is wasting 3/4 of its balloon of signal and in the grey zone repeating a kind of sometimes OK signal. Look at the second red plus sign in the grey zone here:

Since it is upstairs it is actually getting worse than the grey would indicate.

A quick shout out to Google Maps for the images above! If you haven't used Google Maps, you are missing out. Seriously!

I mentioned this apartment was built in the 1920s. This calls for a short bit of geeky stuff.

Radio power, signal strength, distance, and obstacles

The more power a radio transmits with, the more air is in the balloon, the bigger the balloon is and the farther the signal go. There are limits to how much power can be radiated based on the license free status of the Wi-Fi radio spectrum and not every wireless radio can do the maximum allowed radio power. So that is certainly one aspect to take a look at and optimize for your environment.

What devices you are trying to reach and their ability to send a signal back to your wireless access point are the opposite direction of the same problem. If my voice is twice as loud as your voice, as we walk away from each other we will get to a point where you can hear me but I cannot hear you. The same will be true for wireless, so consideration has to be given to what devices you are trying to reach with your wireless access bubble.

A laptop computer with an external wireless network connection and a nice antenna is going to do better than a laptop with a built-in antenna which is going to do better than a cell phone which will do better than a small printed circuit board mounted antenna like you might find inside of an Amazon FireStick or Chromecast.

All of these will take a backseat to a wired network connection, which is always your best fastest most reliable connection.

Here is my laptop - on the left with the built-in antennas and on the right with a cheap USB dongle and an external antenna; note the speed of each connection - even though the laptop built in claims more bars of signal the speed is less than the external antenna:

The laptop has an antenna built in that is probably right behind the display panel ... and surrounded by metal, a display panel, other electronics, ... it just can't speak and hear as well as an antenna not surrounded by all that stuff.

Here is the external antenna, then with the plastic cover removed:

Some quick physics: You can calculate the wavelength in millimeters = 300 / Frequency in GHz.

2.45 is right in the middle of the B/G band, so 300 / 2.45 = 122.45 mm. A common antenna shortening technique is to divide by 2 or 4 for a "Half wave" or "Quarter wave" length antenna... if I divide 122.45 / 4 = 30.6 mm. Here is the antenna insides measured:

So there are two metal tubes, one is about 20mm the other is about 28mm covered with heat shrink tubing.

Close to optimal, but it was a cheap antenna.

What does this mean for you? Lets say you have good coverage for the most part but that one spot is just a little weak. If your radio in that device isn't optimal maybe a spot improvement would help for that device in its position.

Here is an antenna on a printed circuit board - the squiggly thing on the top of the picture. The whole board is about the size of my thumb. There is no way this antenna is better than the longer external antenna:

Here is a miniature wireless adapter that fits into a USB socket:

It is sitting on a bottle cap for a size reference. Any guesses how big its antenna is or how well it performs VS the other two access point antennas??

Yes, size does matter unless you are in a very well covered wi-fi area.

Another possible improvement for your coverage can be made with antennas on your wireless access point. Your radio signal balloon doesn't have to be a round sphere - it can be more compact and pointed, extending outward like ... well like a certain body part - use your imagination:

This is one example - a patch antenna that throws very little signal behind it but pushes all the air in its balloon mostly in one direction.

There is more than you ever wanted to know about antennas, types and radition patterns here:

One big catch: Not all access points support changing out antennas.

All those little possible improvements ... None of them are my preferred method.

Improvement Choice #2: Distributed wireless access points wired together

Your mind-visual on this is "Balloons to fill my home or office and all them conneced by strings so they are sending their data wired to my network infrastructure."

Everything above is cheaper and quicker and >hopefully< solves your problem. But for me, I want my entire living and working areas bathed in a wonderful sea of wireless signals such that I don't have to worry about where I am or do I have enough transmit strength from my phone to reach an access point or a new device comes in and I'm not worried that I've overloaded my setup.

I just want everything to work.

We have 4 wireless access points spread through a 2500 sq. ft. home built in 1929 that has plaster walls. Plaster walls are absolute hell on radio signals - the plaster with its metal screen they put behind it to hold the plaster acts like a Faraday cage shielding radio waves from each room to the next.

Ours are spread out:

1 in the attic shooting down through the dining area and barely hitting the kitchen
1 in the family room covering the family room, the master bedroom above it, and the living room behind the family room
1 in the master bedroom for double coverage of the bedroom and the family room below it
1 in the basement covering the basement and the kitchen

and I'm actually thinking of adding another to give better coverage upstairs ... but that hasn't happeend yet.

I'm not worried about dropping a phone call made on Wi-Fi - they all seamlessly roam between access points.

In another case, I have a client that had horrible WiFi in their house. They asked me the same question, hoping they could buy a product, plug it in and be done with it. Their house is L-O-N-G, has an equally long basement, built in the 1970s with aluminum plates behind the walls (??) and was a horrible mess for wireless.

I spent a half day, installed 3 access points, wired them all together, we positioned them in strategic locations in the basement above the drop ceiling, and now their whole house is bathed in a luxurious sea of Wi-Fi signals. They can watch movies on a tablet in one room on one edge of the house and walk to the other edge and it never misses a beat.

I had a similar problem here at my temporary residence in Seattle, ended up buying a couple of flat Ethernet cables I can run along baseboards or along picture molding and I went from sucky disconnecting wi-fi on my laptop and an Amazon FireTV that couldn't watch a program without pausing to beautiful mostly wired fast connections with wifi in the apartment that nobody else in the building can touch as I'm behind my own firewall.

It took a couple of flat Ethernet cables I snaked up the stairs to the apartment and hung an access point and firewall down from the picture molding. Not pretty but very functional.

If you've gotten this far hopefully you realize there is no "Just buy this product, plug it in and all your problems will be history" solution. And anyone that is trying to sell you such a product without knowing the corner of your world you are trying to get better wifi signals in is selling you a load of bullshit.

There is more I could write - and if I hear any interest then perhaps this article will expand someday.

If you found this helpful or not, please send me a brief email -- one line will more than do. Or more! I love hearing tidbits from users I've helped. Maybe share a line of what you searched for or how you found this article.

I can be reached at:

das (at-sign) dascomputerconsultants (dot) com

If you need assistance designing a good wifi layout for your world, please contact me!

Copyright (C) 2021-2022 DAS Computer Consultants, LTD.  All rights reserved.

David Soussan









<everything below this line are my own notes in what to include above and will be deleted or moved up top once published>



Zones of good coverage and what hurts that coverage - walls doors plaster metal screens etc.

Interference - testing videos and person walked in with cell phone on belt.

Near field interference - WAPs too close together

Airplane wifi layout

Double problem with repeaters - latency. bad for gamers as everyting has to be received and forwareded both direcitons, adding significantly to latency.

talk about mesh networks - latest real world fad, it tries to do what a good network design with proper infrastructure will do only with all the WAPs acting as repeaters for each other.

Mesh link

If you have no choice, do mesh ... but I'd go with a good infrastructure before thinking about implementing a mesh.

Typical range - 100’ outside unobstructed. 1/3 of this for 5.8 ghz.

1/distance squared.

Antenna to beam / push the signal / air to a different shape.

Get a table showing all the typical building materials and how they eat / degrade your radio signal

Drywall, Sheet rock, Tile

Doors, Brick, Plaster, Glass

Metal (garage door?),slow%20or%20intermittent%20connection%20problems.

Multiple access points with overlapping coverage

Add info on Hoisington's house.

Tools for measuring wifi signals - need to talk about them: